Midjourney or GPT-4o Image Generation: Which AI Tool Works Best for Interior Design?
May 5
4 min read
0
18
0
Interior designers often ask: should I use Midjourney or the new GPT-4o for creating images? Both are great AI image tools, but they work in different ways and give different results. Understanding these differences helps you pick the right tool for your design work.
Let's look at how they differ, see some examples, and figure out which one is better for specific tasks in interior design.
Understanding How They Are Different
The main difference is how Midjourney and GPT-4o were trained. They learned from completely different data and this affects the images they create. Think of it this way:
Midjourney: The Creative Artist
Midjourney trained on art, architecture, photography, fashion, and design databases. It doesn't try to make perfect copies of things. It takes inspiration from your prompts or images and creates stylized, artistic interpretations. It's good for coming up with new ideas and concepts. If you give Midjourney a SketchUp image, it will create a new image based on that SketchUp model, but it will add its own style. It won't just replicate the SketchUp model exactly.
GPT-4o Image Generator: The Diligent Design Assistant
GPT-4o tries very hard to follow your instructions precisely. It understands both images and text together. It aims to do exactly what you ask it to. If you give GPT-4o a SketchUp image and ask for a realistic render, it will do its best to make that happen, sticking closely to the original design. The words you use in your prompt are very important for getting what you want from GPT-4o.
Seeing the Difference: Examples
Let's look at how they handle the same tasks.
Rendering a SketchUp Design
Imagine you have a room designed in SketchUp and you want a realistic picture of it. You give both Midjourney and GPT-4o the SketchUp image and the same request for a realistic render.
Midjourney will take the SketchUp image and create an artistic version. It sees the image as inspiration. It might stylize it heavily or change details based on its artistic training. The result might not look like a direct render of your specific design, but rather a creative take on the idea.
GPT-4o, however, will look at the SketchUp image and try to make a realistic picture *of that exact design*. It focuses on keeping the layout, scale, and elements of the original design. The image it produces will be close to your SketchUp model, looking like a quick render.
Creating Images from Text Prompts
What happens when you just use words? Say you ask for a "luxury mudroom, styled for Architectural Digest."
Midjourney often produces images with strong style and mood from text prompts. It might get small details wrong (like boots in odd places), but the overall feeling and creativity can be high. It's great for exploring broad design ideas and getting inspired by different looks.
GPT-4o will also create an image, and its style can be similar to Midjourney's sometimes. However, the results can feel more generic or less "creative" compared to Midjourney's. It tries to fulfill the prompt accurately, but it might not capture the nuanced mood or artistic flair as well as Midjourney does from text descriptions alone. For purely conceptual text prompts where you want high creativity, Midjourney often does a better job.
If you lean towards Midjourney for its creative edge, managing multiple generations and prompts can be a task. Consider exploring the Midjourney Automation Suite from TitanXT to streamline your workflow and make the most of Midjourney's capabilities.
When to Use Each Tool
Both tools can be useful if you have the budget for them.
Use Midjourney For:
Early design concept exploration: Generate ideas and find direction at the start of a project.
Creating mood boards or inspiration images.
Developing stylized visuals or artistic takes on ideas.
Conceptual B-roll or background images for creative content (less recommended for showing your own design work).
Use GPT-4o For:
Creating realistic renders from your existing designs (like SketchUp models). It acts like a quick rendering tool.
Getting images that closely follow specific instructions.
Exploring different angles of a designed space.
Combining image generation with other text-based tasks (like writing emails or planning scope of work), as it's part of a larger language model tool.
Which Tool Should You Choose?
If you can only pay for one tool, GPT-4o is likely the better choice for most interior designers focused on client projects.
Here's why:
It can handle realistic rendering tasks, which is often crucial for client communication and showing your specific design ideas clearly.
It's part of a tool that also offers powerful text capabilities (writing, research, planning), making it more versatile for a design business.
While less specialized, GPT-4o can still generate conceptual images from text prompts, and its ability to follow instructions means you can improve those results with good prompting.
Midjourney excels at pure artistic creativity from text. If your primary need is high-style conceptual imagery without needing to render specific designs accurately, Midjourney is strong. But for diverse tasks including accurate rendering and text work, GPT-4o offers more overall utility.
Whether you choose Midjourney or GPT-4o, integrating AI into your process has benefits. Tools like the Midjourney Automation Suite from TitanXT can help automate repetitive tasks and manage your AI image generation workflow, allowing you to focus on design.
Final Thoughts
Midjourney and GPT-4o are different image tools due to their training. Midjourney is more of a creative artist, good for concepts and style. GPT-4o is a diligent assistant, better at following instructions and creating realistic images of your designs.
Experiment with both if you can, or choose the one that best fits your immediate needs (rendering accuracy and text capabilities for GPT-4o, or pure artistic concept generation for Midjourney). Learning how to use these tools well can definitely benefit your design business.
